For more than 200 years, the residents of Washington, D.C. have been subjected to systemic inequality and denied the full rights of citizenship that the residents of states enjoy—including voting representation in Congress.
The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed H.R. 51 to remedy this imbalance and make Washington the 51st state. This column explores the history underlying D.C. residents’ fight for their full rights as Americans, including efforts to both advance and suppress statehood. The district’s more than 700,000 residents deserve not only to have a vote in Congress but also to enjoy the full benefits of citizenship without being subjected to the uneven and punitive oversight of the federal government and Congress in particular.
Showing posts with label Washington. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington. Show all posts
Thursday, August 27, 2020
Saturday, December 1, 2018
Low-income people pay when government tech contracts sour
Earlier this year, the tech company Novo Dia Group announced it would not continue as a vendor with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, due to a switch in federal contractors. What seemed a run-of-the-mill business decision threw a very real wrench into the availability of locally-grown foods for low-income Americans.
The problem was that Novo Dia held the only keys to a USDA program dedicated to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program processing software and equipment for 1,700 farmers’ markets nationwide. Without Novo Dia providing this service, markets would have no way to accept SNAP — a disruption that would cost farmers income and SNAP recipients food.
The problem was that Novo Dia held the only keys to a USDA program dedicated to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program processing software and equipment for 1,700 farmers’ markets nationwide. Without Novo Dia providing this service, markets would have no way to accept SNAP — a disruption that would cost farmers income and SNAP recipients food.
Tuesday, July 5, 2016
Jacob G. Hornberger: Federal drug enforcement tyranny in Colorado and Washington
Although Colorado and Washington have legalized the sale and possession of marijuana for recreational purposes, possession and distribution of the drug remain a crime under federal law.
However, the U.S. government, including the DEA, has been exempting the residents of those two states from federal drug law enforcement.
That is obviously a good thing for people selling or consuming marijuana in those two states. However, it is not a good thing when it comes to the rule of law and the principle of equal treatment under law.
However, the U.S. government, including the DEA, has been exempting the residents of those two states from federal drug law enforcement.
That is obviously a good thing for people selling or consuming marijuana in those two states. However, it is not a good thing when it comes to the rule of law and the principle of equal treatment under law.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Michael Josephson: The Presidents Day Un-Celebration — Honoring not just the great, but all U.S. presidents
If you’re not going to school or work today, it’s
because it’s a national holiday. The country used to celebrate the birthdays of
George Washington and Abraham Lincoln separately, but in 1971 Richard Nixon and
Congress, in order to create a perpetual three-day weekend, merged the two
holidays into a brand new one called “Presidents’ Day,” to honor all U.S. presidents.
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Sally Steenland: The Political and cultural embrace of marriage equality is growing
Twelve years ago Vermont became the first state to
legalize civil unions for gay and lesbian couples. Back then the term “civil
union” was unfamiliar to most Americans, and the Vermont law seemed radical to
many. Its passage triggered fear campaigns and antigay ballot initiatives that
energized conservatives and helped them win elections across the country.
On Election Day 2012 voters in three
states—Maryland, Maine, and Washington—went far beyond civil unions and
supported marriage equality for gay and lesbian couples. Voters in Minnesota
rejected a constitutional amendment that defined marriage as being between one
man and one woman. These victories mark a dramatic shift in public support for
gay and lesbian equality—all in a little more than a decade since Vermont
passed its civil unions bill.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
