Meanwhile, the woman she replaces in Congress, Mazie
Hirono, will be sworn in as the first Buddhist elected to the U.S. Senate.
Welcome to the new religious America.
Religious diversity, of course, has long been part
of the American landscape. But in 2012, religious minorities became newly
visible and vocal in a society historically dominated by the symbols, values
and leaders of the Protestant faith.
Now that Protestants are no longer in the majority —
as reported in a study released by the Pew Forum in October — even the term
“religious minority” will need fresh definition in our newly minted
minority-majority nation.
The electoral victories of Gabbard and Hirono are
just two of many recent signals that demographic shifts and changing attitudes
are rapidly transforming America’s increasingly crowded public square.
Consider, for example, that for the first time in
our history, none of the presidential or vice presidential candidates of either
major party was a white Protestant.
Even more remarkable, the Mormon candidate not only
received nearly half of the popular vote, but Mitt Romney was also supported in
large numbers by evangelical voters who polls previously told us would not vote
for a Mormon.
Religious affiliation (or lack thereof) is still a
factor in public life. But the level of voter acceptance of candidates
affiliated with historically unelectable faiths is growing.
When Congress convenes in January, significant
numbers of politicians from groups with long histories of discrimination in
America — notably Jews, Catholics and Mormons — will fill both chambers, many
in leadership positions.
And let’s not overlook the fact that the current
U.S. Supreme Court is made up of six Catholic and three Jewish justices and —
another first — no Protestant.
Not surprisingly, there has been some backlash and
resentment from those who don’t like the changing religious face of America —
or who fear a falling away from the “Christian nation” they believe we are
intended to be.
In 2012, American Muslims continued to be prime
targets of both resentment and fear with debates in many state legislatures
over anti-Shariah bills and protests in many communities over the building of
mosques.
The most tragic religious-bias incident occurred on
Aug. 6 when a white supremacist gunman attacked a Sikh temple in Wisconsin
(perhaps in the mistaken belief that Sikhs are Muslims), killing six and
wounding four.
But 2012 was also the year that American Muslims
joined by many interfaith coalitions pushed back, defeating or stalling
anti-Shariah legislation in a number of states and defeating several
anti-Muslim candidates at the ballot box, including Florida Congressman Allen
West.
The growing visibility and strength of America’s
religious diversity is good news for religious freedom. The First Amendment
affords legal protections, but it cannot fully prevent people in the majority
from imposing social discrimination and political exclusion on those in the
minority.
As James Madison argued at our nation’s founding,
religious freedom is best secured in a society of many faiths and beliefs —
with none in the majority. “For where there is such a variety of sects,” wrote
Madison, “there cannot be a majority of any one sect to oppress and persecute
the rest.”
Religious diversity, in other words, helps level the
playing field, giving people of all faiths and none freedom to compete in the
marketplace of ideas.
In religion, as in economics, monopolies stifle
growth and innovation. That’s why the end of the Protestant hegemony in America
will be no loss for religious people of any tradition, including Protestants.
On the contrary, as domination of one faith recedes,
freedom for all faiths and beliefs expands — moving us ever closer to
fulfilling the promise of religious liberty under the First Amendment.
About the author: Charles C. Haynes is director of
the Religious Freedom Education Project at the Newseum, 555 Pennsylvania Ave.,
N.W., Washington, D.C., 20001. Web: http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/.
E-mail: chaynes[at]freedomforum.org.
This article was published by the First Amendment
Center.
No comments:
Post a Comment