As the budget hearings began for the 2016 Alabama Legislative Session in January, the largest Powerball lottery sweepstakes in American history was playing out. It was one of the biggest news stories of the year.
Legislators were hearing the same song, second verse, that they heard last year. The General Fund is about $200 million short. If the money is not found, we will lose $500 million in Medicaid federal matching dollars, most state highways will be without state troopers, and most counties - not just in the Black Belt - will be unable to grant or renew driver’s licenses. In addition, the federal courts will take over our prisons and more than likely release hundreds of convicts on the streets, and state employees will either be let go or have their take home pay cut again for the eighth straight year.
At the same time that legislators were hearing that Alabama needs $200 million to make ends meet, most of their constituents were buying lottery tickets in Georgia, Florida and Tennessee, and the rest were going to Biloxi to the casinos. Ironically, the amount of money that Alabama would receive from having this money stay in state from a lottery is $200 million.
Most Alabamians find it ludicrous that we allow our money to exit the state to our neighboring states. Alabama and Utah are the only two states in America that derive no state revenue from gambling. We are one of only five of the 50 states who have no lottery. Our neighboring state of Mississippi does not have a lottery because they get most of their state revenue from casino gambling.
The largest number of lottery tickets sold in the recent Powerball in Tennessee, Florida and Georgia were in outlets on the border of Alabama, and guess who was buying those tickets. You guessed correctly - Alabamians. They say the lines on the Florida border were so long that they backed up to Andalusia and Atmore.
The last time Alabamians were allowed to vote on a lottery was 1999. It lost on a narrow vote because of the large amount of pork and questionable spending attached to the constitutional amendment. Alabama Senator Jim McClendon (R-St. Clair) has come forth with a clean lottery proposal. It is very simple. It succinctly calls for a yes or no vote on an Alabama owned lottery. The proposal does not lay out any details for the operations of the program nor does it spell out how the money would be spent.
If passed by the legislature it would go before voters in the November general election. The legislature would then establish a lottery in the 2017 regular session.
Senator McClendon in announcing his reason for offering the legislation said that he was simply trying to respond to the demand of his constituents who have told him, “Let us vote. We want to vote.” He added, “I have heard it time and time again.”
At least one legislator is listening to the people who sent him to Montgomery. The cry from throughout the state is deafening. People want to vote. Polling reveals that the lottery would pass by a two to one margin at this time if it were placed on the ballot. My guess is that it would be more like three to one. Alabamians are sick and tired of their money funding the governments of Florida and Georgia.
Democrats in the House and Senate want the lottery to be similar to Georgia’s, which allows all the money to accrue to go only toward education.
The people of Alabama want the right to vote. It is hard to understand how a legislator could refuse to allow his or her constituents to exercise the right to vote on this issue.
Alabamians gamble and Alabamians buy lottery tickets. They want their money to stay home.
A constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds vote of both chambers, 63 votes in the House and 21 votes in the Senate to allow a vote of the people on the lottery issue.
About the author: Steve Flowers is Alabama’s leading political columnist. His weekly column appears in over 60 Alabama newspapers. He served 16 years in the state legislature. Steve may be reached at www.steveflowers.us. He can also be found on Facebook and Twitter.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment