Editor’s note: The Costs of Wars project was started in 2011 to assess the long-term consequences of the post-9/11 wars. Project co-director Neta C. Crawford, professor and chair of political science at Boston University, explains the major implications of the Iraq War for the federal budget.
Even if the U.S. administration decided to leave — or was evicted from — Iraq immediately, the bill of war to the U.S. to date would be an estimated US$1,922 billion in current dollars.
Showing posts with label Department of Defense. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Department of Defense. Show all posts
Monday, February 24, 2020
Monday, November 28, 2016
Open questions on national security for President-Elect Donald Trump
The Center for American Progress National Security and International Policy team is deeply committed to the democratic values that have made America great and is collectively determined to ensure that America remains secure, prosperous, and just.
The initial steps taken by President-elect Donald Trump, including the nomination of several manifestly unsuited candidates for key national security positions, raise a series of very serious questions that the administration will need to answer in the days and weeks ahead.
The initial steps taken by President-elect Donald Trump, including the nomination of several manifestly unsuited candidates for key national security positions, raise a series of very serious questions that the administration will need to answer in the days and weeks ahead.
Thursday, February 5, 2015
Jacob G. Hornberger: The national security establishment vs. defense
I have a simple proposal: Why not bring all the troops home from Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, and elsewhere in the Middle East? I mean all of them. Bring them all home and let them defend the United States. After all, it’s called the Department of Defense, right? Well, what would be wrong with applying the principle of defense to our country by bringing all the troops home and having them defend the United States?
Friday, June 7, 2013
5 Myths about military sexual assault
On Tuesday the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Judge
Advocate Generals of the Armed Forces testified before the Senate Armed
Services Committee on various proposals to combat sexual assault in the
military. Testimony was offered in the wake of the release of the Defense
Department’s annual report showing that despite the military’s efforts to ramp
up sexual assault prevention programs in recent years, rates of sexual assault
in the military climbed by 34 percent between 2010 and 2012. A total of 26,000
service members are estimated to have experienced unwanted sexual contact in
2012 compared to 19,300 in 2010. Moreover, less than 3 out of every 100
estimated sexual assaults in the military in 2012 were ever prosecuted—a
shockingly low percentage that has shown no sign of improvement.
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
The Real scandal in Libya: A security vacuum and new terrorist threats
President Barack Obama’s political opponents are
trying once again to manufacture a scandal out of the tragic deaths of four
American government personnel at a U.S. facility in Benghazi, Libya, last
September. Among those killed was the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Christopher
Stevens. The current political and media feeding frenzy surrounding the
Benghazi attacks is no more than a parsing of interagency debates on post-attack
talking points, and it is based on what former Secretary of Defense Robert
Gates called “cartoonish” views of U.S. military capabilities.
Monday, January 7, 2013
Gene Policinski: We need to see the Gitmo proceedings
As things now stand, Americans will not be able to
see TV coverage of upcoming 9/11-related trials from Guantanamo Bay.
The situation is regrettable — but easily remedied.
A military judge last week said he had no authority
to override an earlier decision by the Department of Defense that denied
requests by the defense attorneys for the accused and by and news-related
groups to televise the trials. In late November, the Pentagon said it would
provide ample transparency for the proceedings through news coverage, a remote
viewing site at Fort Meade, Md., and a website that posts transcripts of the
pre-trial proceedings within 24 hours of hearings.
Monday, August 27, 2012
Steven Bucci: How will defense cuts affect you?
Washington is abuzz with wonky discussions on
potential mandatory budget cuts that will hit on Jan. 2. The process is called
"sequestration." It is so technical that right now you may be tempted
to move on to another article. After all, this is merely "inside
Washington baseball," right? Sadly, it isn't.
The Department of Defense (DoD) budget is set to
absorb the lion's share of the New Year's cuts, which will go into effect if
steps are not taken to stop them. DoD makes up about 11 percent of federal
spending, but will eat 47 percent of the cuts. That's a pretty sizable chunk.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
