Exactly four days after long-anticipated sequester
furloughs began for air-traffic controllers, Congress decided the furloughs
were not such a good idea after all. It also decided that perhaps it wasn’t a
problem caused by an administrator trying to showboat the evils of
across-the-board cuts but in fact a problem with the legislation that the
members of Congress had crafted themselves—legislation directing that
across-the-board cuts be taken from each program, project and activity within
the $7.5 billion appropriated for air-traffic operations.
Showing posts with label budgets cuts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label budgets cuts. Show all posts
Friday, April 26, 2013
Scott Lilly: Whack-a-Mole budgeting
The preposterous legislative sideshow taking place
around sequestration gives a pretty clear picture of how little the people who
were elected to run the government actually know about it.
Monday, August 27, 2012
Steven Bucci: How will defense cuts affect you?
Washington is abuzz with wonky discussions on
potential mandatory budget cuts that will hit on Jan. 2. The process is called
"sequestration." It is so technical that right now you may be tempted
to move on to another article. After all, this is merely "inside
Washington baseball," right? Sadly, it isn't.
The Department of Defense (DoD) budget is set to
absorb the lion's share of the New Year's cuts, which will go into effect if
steps are not taken to stop them. DoD makes up about 11 percent of federal
spending, but will eat 47 percent of the cuts. That's a pretty sizable chunk.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
