This article was published by the First Amendment
Center.
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Gordon T. Belt: Banned Books Week: Defending our freedom to read
“I cannot
live without books.” — Thomas Jefferson.
Of all Jefferson’s inspiring and thought-provoking
quotes, this one is among my favorites. As the First Amendment Center’s
librarian, I have a special affinity for books, and as someone academically
trained as a historian, I have an appreciation for the Founding Fathers and for
the important words they left behind.
Banned Books Week — Sept. 24 through Oct. 1 — is an
annual recognition by librarians and book-minded people that the First
Amendment should never be taken for granted. I believe the freedoms embraced by
the Founding Fathers in the 45 words of the First Amendment also speak to an
implied freedom to read, yet history shows us that the struggle to maintain
that freedom has never been easy.
Jefferson believed that censorship only served to
draw attention to books that might otherwise be ignored or forgotten. In 1814,
Jefferson wrote to his Philadelphia bookseller, Nicolas G. Dufief, concerning
Jefferson’s purchase of a book by Regnault de Bécourt, La Création du Monde.
American authorities claimed that de Bécourt’s book contained blasphemous
material, and had accused the author of selling his book to Jefferson. In
coming to de Bécourt’s defense Jefferson eloquently stated, “I am really
mortified to be told that, in the United States of America, a fact like this
can become a subject of inquiry, and of criminal inquiry too, as an offense
against religion; that a question about the sale of a book can be carried
before the civil magistrate.”
Throughout our nation’s history, words that have
questioned the authority of our government and religious institutions have
faced public scrutiny. Even works by our most well-known Founding Fathers have
been censored out of fear of rebellion and societal decay.
Thomas Paine is considered to be one of the most
important and influential thinkers of his generation, yet his works, The Rights
of Man (1791) and The Age of Reason (published in three parts in 1794, 1795 and
1807), were targets of hostility and censorship from the government and from
the religious establishment for their perceived seditious and blasphemous
content.
Benjamin Franklin’s book, The Autobiography of
Benjamin Franklin (1791), was censored from its first publication for its bawdy
language and references to his sexual dalliances.
Books are sources of inspiration, they challenge our
thoughts, and they inform our beliefs. Yet, even in the “Age of Enlightenment,”
the Founding Fathers were not immune to the overzealous desire to control what
was read by the public — for example, President John Adams’ ill-advised
Sedition Act of 1798, which banned newspaper editorials critical of the
government.
James Madison, considered by many scholars as the
“Father of the Constitution” once said, “A popular Government without popular
information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a
Tragedy, or perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people
who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which
knowledge gives.”
In a free society, books — whether they are in print
or in digital form — provide us with the very knowledge that Madison spoke of,
and that Jefferson forcefully defended. Banned Books Week reminds us how easily
our First Amendment freedoms can be taken from us if we allow ignorance to
inform our thoughts and actions.
About the author: Gordon Belt is the Library Manager
for the First Amendment Center.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No books have been banned in the USA for about half a century. Thomas Sowell calls BBW "National Hogwash Week" and for good reason. See: http://tinyurl.com/Sowell
ReplyDeleteAs former ALA Councilor Jessamyn West said, "It also highlights the thing we know about Banned Books Week that we don't talk about much — the bulk of these books are challenged by parents for being age-inappropriate for children. While I think this is still a formidable thing for librarians to deal with, it's totally different from people trying to block a book from being sold at all."