For decades, anti-choice politicians have sought to erode women’s reproductive rights by structuring legislation in a way that allows some women to access comprehensive reproductive care, while blocking others from doing so. These efforts implicitly divide women into distinct groups in order to help many opponents of choice advance their ultimate goal of ending access for every woman in an incremental, more politically palatable manner.
Two cases that went before the U.S. Supreme Court this past term—Zubik v. Burwell and Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt—also demonstrate the anti-choice movement’s systematic efforts to divide women into groups and limit each group’s rights step by step.
Showing posts with label Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt. Show all posts
Saturday, July 23, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
