Following the re-election of President Barack Obama
and the Republican embarrassment in the U.S. Senate races no one would have
believed that any state would be able to muster support for passage of
right-to-work legislation in any state. Yet on December 11th, in spite of
fierce opposition from Michigan labor unions, the Michigan State Legislature
passed legislation that Gov. Rick Snyder signed making Michigan the 24th
right-to-work state.
In 2011, the Wisconsin Legislature passed
right-to-work legislation that resulted in massive protests by labor unions
there. Even though the labor unions threatened retribution, state legislators
and Governor Scott Walker stood firm. The unions initiated recall elections
that resulted in the Republican loss of majority in the Wisconsin State Senate,
but the Republicans regained the majority in the 2012 election. In addition,
the unions’ effort to defeat Gov. Walker in a recall not only failed, but he
was re-elected by a greater margin in the recall than when he was elected in
the 2010 general election.
Moreover, despite disruptive actions of the unions,
Indiana followed Wisconsin’s lead and passed their own right-to-work law.
The reason the Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan
right-to-work victories are so important is that it is proof that conservatives
can still win.
Advancing workers’ freedom is not the only issue
where governors and state legislatures have taken a strong stand. As of January
4th, there are 26 states, including Alabama, that are refusing to establish
state health exchanges and seven other states that are still undecided. If
governors in these states maintain their commitment to refuse to establish the
health exchanges, it appears that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) cannot be fully
implemented.
Without the exchanges, the key components of the law
such as the premium-assistance tax credits cannot be implemented. The law
clearly restricts the administration of the premium-assistance tax credits to
state-run exchanges. Despite the Obama Administration’s arguments to the
contrary, there is no clear parallel authority in the law for the federal
government to administer the credits or even impose taxes on those who refuse
to participate if the state exchanges do not exist.
In addition, the state of Oklahoma has a lawsuit
challenging the recent rule that authorizes the IRS to distribute tax credits
and subsidies through federally-operated health insurance exchanges in states
that refuse to establish their own exchanges.
Oklahoma’s Attorney General Scott Pruitt is making the case that the IRS
rule is unconstitutional because it violates a provision in the ACA that
explicitly denies subsidies and credits to states who fail to comply. Moreover,
the ACA specifies that the fines and penalties will apply only to individuals
or companies eligible to receive the tax credits and subsidies. According to
the Oklahoma suit, If a state does not set up the exchange, the residents of
that state are not eligible to receive the tax credits and subsidies and
therefore, are not subject to the fines and penalties. Therefore, the federal
government has no legal authority to implement either if a state doesn’t
establish a health exchange.
States are also taking action to protect their
citizens’ Second Amendment rights in opposition to President Obama and the
Democrats’ efforts to impose expansive gun control laws and some states are
preparing to challenge the Obama Administration on energy and environmental
policies that are killing their economies.
The states form a strong line of defense against the
liberal agenda that the Obama Administration is trying shove down our
throats. We must make a stand at the
state level to defend our freedom against the federal government’s
encroachments. The fact that there are strong and courageous state leaders who
are willing to take on tough issues against powerful opposition should be of
great encouragement to conservatives to stay the course and not give up.
The bottom line is that the battle for freedom is
not over; it is just going to be fought in places other than Washington, D.C.
About the author: Gary Palmer is president of the
Alabama Policy Institute, a non-partisan, non-profit research and education
organization dedicated to the preservation of free markets, limited government
and strong families, which are indispensable to a prosperous society.
This article was published by the Alabama Policy
Institute.
No comments:
Post a Comment